Saturday, 23 June 2012
(Not) A Statement from Ed Milliband
“I, along with my Labour colleagues very much regret the way my party has for decades vigorously quashed any meaningful debate about immigration. We feel in some way responsible for having ensured the censorship and marginalisation of those wishing to expose these evil crimes and as a consequence creating the climate and conditions for the racially motivated rape of English children to reach epidemic proportions.”
“What we have done, whilst grovelling for votes from the Muslim community, is to systematically betray the white working class we purport to represent. In effect we have sold the children of those families to the Islamic community in exchange for our highly paid political positions. Not only that, in so doing we have sought to protect ourselves from exposure by seeking to imprison our political opponents from Damien Green to Nick Griffin. This massive betrayal of the British people has been achieved with the complicity of a totally rigged and biased media and high level corruption in the civil service.”
“How on earth we justified the sweeping under the carpet the rape,murder and prostitution of our own children in a blatant attempt to head off support for the political right, I will never know.”
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
Give Us This Day Our Smith & Wesson
Not for the first time, handing responsibility to citizens for their own protection sees a fall in crime:-
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/18/gun-ownership-up-crime-down/
and
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/10/more_guns_fewer_murders.html
Mauser, in a report to the UK Home Office, demonstrated that murder rates have risen every year in the UK since the handgun ban.
So, when are UK citizens going to get their rights back? The TUI (Thugs In Uniform) now only carry out the bidding of the socialist Cameron parliament acting, as they were converted to do under Bliar and Bruin, as tax collectors.
Plod is not fit for purpose, more concerned in protecting the ‘rights’ of scum, paedostanis and other sundry miscreants (homegrown and imported varieties) than protecting the property or person of the law-abiding majority that are forced to fund their ever-more expensive toys (fast cars and helicopters being the latest examples). The entrance criteria (mental and physical) for the Force should be used to identify the brightest, strongest and bravest, not used to identify the dumbest as potential officers, along with weak women, short-arses and any ethnic, deviant or pervert that applies.
In an equal, multi-cultural society, how can there be a black coppers association or shirt-lifters group? Where’s the white coppers association, the happy heterosexual club?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/18/gun-ownership-up-crime-down/
and
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/10/more_guns_fewer_murders.html
Mauser, in a report to the UK Home Office, demonstrated that murder rates have risen every year in the UK since the handgun ban.
So, when are UK citizens going to get their rights back? The TUI (Thugs In Uniform) now only carry out the bidding of the socialist Cameron parliament acting, as they were converted to do under Bliar and Bruin, as tax collectors.
Plod is not fit for purpose, more concerned in protecting the ‘rights’ of scum, paedostanis and other sundry miscreants (homegrown and imported varieties) than protecting the property or person of the law-abiding majority that are forced to fund their ever-more expensive toys (fast cars and helicopters being the latest examples). The entrance criteria (mental and physical) for the Force should be used to identify the brightest, strongest and bravest, not used to identify the dumbest as potential officers, along with weak women, short-arses and any ethnic, deviant or pervert that applies.
In an equal, multi-cultural society, how can there be a black coppers association or shirt-lifters group? Where’s the white coppers association, the happy heterosexual club?
Sunday, 17 June 2012
The Dumbest of Dumbfucks
Salafist group warns tomatoes are “Christian”
(Photo via Facebook.com)
This makes perfect sense... because it makes no sense.
A Salafist group called the Popular Egyptian Islamic Association has come under fire after sending out a warning on Facebook urging its followers not to eat tomatoes because the vegetable (or fruit) is a Christian food.
The group posted a photo on its page of a tomato - which appears to reveal the shape of a cross after being cut in half – along with the message: “Eating tomatoes is forbidden because they are Christian. [The tomato] praises the cross instead of Allah and says that Allah is three (a reference to the Trinity).
[God help us]. I implore you to spread this photo because there is a sister from Palestine who saw the prophet of Allah [Mohammad] in a vision and he was crying, warning his nation against eating them [tomatoes]. If you don’t spread this [message], know that it is the devil who stopped you.”
Yeah... no.
Predictably, Facebook users expressed outrage over the post, which prompted the group to clarify its stance on the controversy with the update, “We didn’t say you can’t eat tomatoes. We said don’t cut it in [such a way that reveals] the cross shape.”
I see what you did there. Crazy religious nutjobs are still crazy.
I wonder if the Muslim Brotherhood’s presidential candidate, Mohammad Morsi, is happy about getting an endorsement from this group?
And I'll add my two'pennorth to justify the headline. If,as they claim, Allah created all things - then he created the Tomato, complete with cross!
Islam don't like exposure
Is the following 'hate speech'?
“Muslims are the vilest of animals…”
“Show mercy to one another, but be ruthless to Muslims”
“How perverse are Muslims!”
“Strike off the heads of Muslims, as well as their fingertips”
“Fight those Muslims who are near to you”
“Muslim mischief makers should be murdered or crucified”
Yet change the word 'Muslim' for 'Christian' and every line comes from the Koran and Hadiths.
And isn't it a strange religion that punishes sex between consenting adults but permits it with the dead?
The full story here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2160889/Christian-protestors-taunt-Arab-Americans-pigs-head-stake-Detroit-festival.html
“Muslims are the vilest of animals…”
“Show mercy to one another, but be ruthless to Muslims”
“How perverse are Muslims!”
“Strike off the heads of Muslims, as well as their fingertips”
“Fight those Muslims who are near to you”
“Muslim mischief makers should be murdered or crucified”
Yet change the word 'Muslim' for 'Christian' and every line comes from the Koran and Hadiths.
And isn't it a strange religion that punishes sex between consenting adults but permits it with the dead?
The full story here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2160889/Christian-protestors-taunt-Arab-Americans-pigs-head-stake-Detroit-festival.html
Tuesday, 5 June 2012
All Over Bar the Shouting
As the EU slowly disintegrates and the Germans stand by, ready to take
over the mainland continent at last, I’m reminded of a tale an elderly Uncle
tells of landing recently at CDG, Paris. At the French immigration desk
he took a few moments to locate his passport in his hand-luggage.
“You ‘ave been to France before, Monsieur?” the French immigration officer asks with typical french hauteur.
“Yes I have” the elderly gentleman replies
“Then you should know that you ‘ave to ‘ave your passport ready”
The elderly British gentleman replies “But the last time I was here, I didn’t have to show it.”
“C’est impossible! The British always have to show their passports on arrival in France!”
The elderly British man gives the Frenchman a long hard look. Then quietly explaines “Well, when I came ashore on that Normandy Beach on D-Day in 1944, I couldn’t find any f***ing Frenchmen to show it to…”
Having saved the sundry wops, dagos, spics and frogs from the sausage-munchers twice in one Century, let the buggers save themselves this time.
These continentals need a history lesson occasionally - a bit like the Lufthansa Pilot at Frankfurt, upbraided by Air Traffic Control for requesting take-off clearance in German.
"I am a German pilot, flying a plane of the national airline from an airport in my own Country - why should I speak in English?"
"Because we won the war" answered a BA pilot on final approach!
“You ‘ave been to France before, Monsieur?” the French immigration officer asks with typical french hauteur.
“Yes I have” the elderly gentleman replies
“Then you should know that you ‘ave to ‘ave your passport ready”
The elderly British gentleman replies “But the last time I was here, I didn’t have to show it.”
“C’est impossible! The British always have to show their passports on arrival in France!”
The elderly British man gives the Frenchman a long hard look. Then quietly explaines “Well, when I came ashore on that Normandy Beach on D-Day in 1944, I couldn’t find any f***ing Frenchmen to show it to…”
Having saved the sundry wops, dagos, spics and frogs from the sausage-munchers twice in one Century, let the buggers save themselves this time.
These continentals need a history lesson occasionally - a bit like the Lufthansa Pilot at Frankfurt, upbraided by Air Traffic Control for requesting take-off clearance in German.
"I am a German pilot, flying a plane of the national airline from an airport in my own Country - why should I speak in English?"
"Because we won the war" answered a BA pilot on final approach!
Trust the BBC to fuck it up.
“… the peaceful atmosphere of Ambridge, home of BBC Radio 4 serial The Archers, is turning nastier.
The programme’s acting editor John Yorke, a former executive producer of gritty TV soap EastEnders, has promised to make the plotlines ‘darker and bigger’.”
Having buggered up the nations enjoyment of the Jubillee celebrations, the BBC are now set to ‘modernise’ the Archers, enjoyed by Brits the world over.
So, between now and Christmas, I wonder how many more gays they can cram into the village (it’s a long time since there was only one). We can expect the village divided when the pikeys turn up (for how a rural village really reacts, rather than in BBCworld [or lah-lah-land], go to http://www.meridenraid.org.uk/?p=271) and no doubt there’ll be a sympathetic storyline when the Bull is turned into a mosque.
Perhaps for 2013, they can follow up with how the muslim influx beat up the vicar and threw all the gays off the belltower, how the pikeys were revealed to be running a slave labour camp and, of course, the inevitable sex ring drags in Brian Archer.
Any other storylines you can envisage?
The programme’s acting editor John Yorke, a former executive producer of gritty TV soap EastEnders, has promised to make the plotlines ‘darker and bigger’.”
Having buggered up the nations enjoyment of the Jubillee celebrations, the BBC are now set to ‘modernise’ the Archers, enjoyed by Brits the world over.
So, between now and Christmas, I wonder how many more gays they can cram into the village (it’s a long time since there was only one). We can expect the village divided when the pikeys turn up (for how a rural village really reacts, rather than in BBCworld [or lah-lah-land], go to http://www.meridenraid.org.uk/?p=271) and no doubt there’ll be a sympathetic storyline when the Bull is turned into a mosque.
Perhaps for 2013, they can follow up with how the muslim influx beat up the vicar and threw all the gays off the belltower, how the pikeys were revealed to be running a slave labour camp and, of course, the inevitable sex ring drags in Brian Archer.
Any other storylines you can envisage?
Saturday, 12 May 2012
Time for Cultural Relativism
With the arrest of a second bunch of Muslim perverts in Rochdale, surely the time is fast
approaching when even the most blinkered, PC western establishments
realise that Muslims and the disgusting creed they follow has no place
in the western world?
Muslims owe their allegiance to no nation or other political division, their book of hate orders that they work towards the establishment of a caliphate, a Muslim world where the few non-Muslims they allow to live exist in a state of fiscal and mental servitude.
No Muslim can honestly pledge allegiance and they are permitted to lie if it furthers the aims of Islam. This means they can have no place in the Police, any Armed Forces, the Intelligence Services or the Judiciary. Nor can they have any place in politics and no position that lets the deviants anywhere near young children, especially girls. Neither must they be allowed to teach or preach.
If they cannot pledge allegiance to a nation, then they cannot possibly be citizens of any civilised nation (or America) and must be either Stateless (as the Arab nations have deliberately made the Jordanians that live adjacent to Israel – Palestine has no basis in international law) or accepted back into the hell-holes they claim to have escaped from. By so doing, we can effectively control their movements, remove them from our western airlines and free ourselves of the so-called security shackle they have placed upon us.
Until they sit down, of their own volition, and review their book of hate and all the baggage that goes with it, recognising it is inappropriate for the modern world, that it is not the 6th or 7th Century and needs to accept, for example, that women are mentally equal (and most western women are actually mentally light years ahead of them) and that all men have an equal place and worth on this planet, they must be marginalised and treated as the second-rate, dangerous individuals they are.
This, surely, is the basis of moral relativism and should be the real debate we are having. Are the tenets, actions and cultures of all belief systems equally valid? Of course not or we would still be slaving in Africa (I know Muslims still are, but that just reinforces the argument). Islam is stuck. It has been constructed in such a way that it cannot evolve in the light of changing conditions nor the development of new knowledge (the Koran still claims the world is flat, for f**k’s sake!) and must go the way of all that cannot evolve.
Free men rid England of their oppressors, free men drove the English oppressors out of the US, free men rid us of the Nazis, of the threat from Communism and Fascism. Islam needs to fully understand that word freedom and place it alongside the meaning of Islam. They will find ‘Islam’ wanting. Ultimately, free men will rid us of Islam unless it grows up and joins the modern world.
Muslims owe their allegiance to no nation or other political division, their book of hate orders that they work towards the establishment of a caliphate, a Muslim world where the few non-Muslims they allow to live exist in a state of fiscal and mental servitude.
No Muslim can honestly pledge allegiance and they are permitted to lie if it furthers the aims of Islam. This means they can have no place in the Police, any Armed Forces, the Intelligence Services or the Judiciary. Nor can they have any place in politics and no position that lets the deviants anywhere near young children, especially girls. Neither must they be allowed to teach or preach.
If they cannot pledge allegiance to a nation, then they cannot possibly be citizens of any civilised nation (or America) and must be either Stateless (as the Arab nations have deliberately made the Jordanians that live adjacent to Israel – Palestine has no basis in international law) or accepted back into the hell-holes they claim to have escaped from. By so doing, we can effectively control their movements, remove them from our western airlines and free ourselves of the so-called security shackle they have placed upon us.
Until they sit down, of their own volition, and review their book of hate and all the baggage that goes with it, recognising it is inappropriate for the modern world, that it is not the 6th or 7th Century and needs to accept, for example, that women are mentally equal (and most western women are actually mentally light years ahead of them) and that all men have an equal place and worth on this planet, they must be marginalised and treated as the second-rate, dangerous individuals they are.
This, surely, is the basis of moral relativism and should be the real debate we are having. Are the tenets, actions and cultures of all belief systems equally valid? Of course not or we would still be slaving in Africa (I know Muslims still are, but that just reinforces the argument). Islam is stuck. It has been constructed in such a way that it cannot evolve in the light of changing conditions nor the development of new knowledge (the Koran still claims the world is flat, for f**k’s sake!) and must go the way of all that cannot evolve.
Free men rid England of their oppressors, free men drove the English oppressors out of the US, free men rid us of the Nazis, of the threat from Communism and Fascism. Islam needs to fully understand that word freedom and place it alongside the meaning of Islam. They will find ‘Islam’ wanting. Ultimately, free men will rid us of Islam unless it grows up and joins the modern world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)